my knees are bent for you
my skin is quiet
I shed drops of Witnessing
into the waiting of your hands
the shadows have ascended
silver rays reflected
your world is becoming
it is in all the voices
my knees are bent for you
my skin is quiet
I shed drops of Witnessing
into the waiting of your hands
the shadows have ascended
silver rays reflected
your world is becoming
it is in all the voices
here shall words arrive
not on my lips, nor yours
but still caressed
a meeting of sorts
out of sorts
still always flowing
an uncovering of
of what
what
will your tongue see
your eyes hear
our heart sing?
Just joined academia.edu – a place specifically for sharing academc-related information, including full papers! See my page at:
The following exercise was proposed:
Take the following list, culled from a critique of Ken Wilber’s work by philosopher William Irwin Thompson, Coming Into Being and write the opposites.
simplistic
how to fix
compulsive mappings
textbook categorizations
control the universe through mapping
dominant masculinist purposefulness
shift power from the described to the describer
psychic inflation and self-magnification
a grand pyramid with the advocate on top
lacking poetic insights
lacking a feeling for the concrete
lacking embodiment of an aesthetic
My response:
simplistic —> complex
how to fix —> how to engage
compulsive mappings —> flexible relations
textbook categorizations —> situational phenomenologies
control the universe through mapping —> participate in the universe through walking its territory
dominant masculinist purposefulness —> creatively shifting between feminine/masculine
shift power from the described to the describer —> described and describer abdicate power to each other
psychic inflation and self-magnification —> psychic robustness and continuous self-recontextualization
a grand pyramid with the advocate on top —> a complex web with the advocate teleporting between nodes
lacking poetic insights —> poetry as rhythmic healing
lacking a feeling for the concrete —> able to connect without abstraction through action
lacking embodiment of an aesthetic —> able to create and shift between evolving aesthetics
I’d like to make a contribution with regards to circularity/linearity, from a geometrical standpoint. If you don’t like geometry, stop reading, or better yet, read with increased intensity.
The polarity between circle/line is one that is fundamental to many geometries – they are taken to be quite different logical entities. Primarily this arises because of (in a move parallel to Russel’s need to introduce the Theory of Types to avoid paradox) a limited way of dealing with infinity. Cybernetics shows us, by providing a wider view (attention to relations, recursions, and thus relations of relations, etc.) that the Theory of Types is unnecessary and points towards a more flexible and mysterious understanding of paradox. In the same way, projective geometry provides a way of dealing with infinity that encompasses, expands, and re-frames the conventional geometric view. (more…)
I updated the main page to load much faster, and created a page of alchemical images:
https://spiritalchemy.com/alchemyimages.htm
Please beware that the page is LOADED with images, in order that they can be easily browsed, so it may take a minute to load.