It's Elemental

Tag: Polarities

  • on destruction

    The role of destruction, and of the working out of polarities, is a subject that has been dealt with an the alchemical tradition for a very long time.  Alchemically, it is understood that the issue you are dealing with, in which you find yourself (the prima materia) MUST go through a process of putrefaction, of fermentation… the individual elements cannot by themselves produce a work of lasting value (a Great Work), but must be destroyed in order to be refined.  The refined elements then have the capacity to ‘marry’ the other elements to form a higher, more integrated, more complex and simple unity which ennobles and embodies the transformation of the worst parts of ‘the matter’.

    All diagnoses are misdiagnoses because they stay at the level of the overt fact, and do not take into account the necessary inclusion of relationshipreversal, and the whole.  The image of the fireweed and the pinecone are examples in nature of the aspect of the Fire element in which destruction is required for new life.  In this sense, the destruction is viewed not as a negative process but as a transformative one, in which the potentials of the lower state are realizable only through their passing away, and indeed, it is their very passing away which creates the space (Air element) into which the potential new state can flow, because room is made for it.

    The same pattern occurs in the human being all the time – we do not transform without the heat of the Fire, also known as the Will – but not a will directed towards a specific absolute (an Earth), but what is known as an ‘open will’, which is just the part which maintains itself by transforming itself through its own death into a new state…

    20050601-img_3750

  • concerning the evolution of consciousness

    Earth –> Day-waking (i.e. ‘normal’ adult) consciousness 
    Water –> Imaginative consciousness 
    Air —-> Inspirational consciousness 
    Fire —> Intuitive consciousness  

    Earth –> Thinking ‘about’ – object-oriented 
    Water –> Thinking ‘with’ – process oriented 
    Air —-> Thinking ‘between’ – polarity-oriented, (Brad exemplifies this very well) 
    Fire —-> Thinking ‘as’ – whole-oriented  

    Further, considering that all thinking is relational, and all relations are between beings:  

    Earth –> consciousness of other as if the other was an object (separation) 
    Water –> consciousness of other as if you were dreaming into the other’s experience, as if you were ‘seeing’ in an inner way the other’s perspective 
    Air —-> consciousness of other “as if” you were the other from the inside, as if you were ‘hearing’ in an inner way the tonality of the other’s experience 
    Fire —> consciousness of other AS the other, as if the other were living through and into you directly, with almost no distinction between who is who  

    The sequence is one which lays out the polarities between separation and coincidence of self and other.  Goethe made a strong case for the Water, or process, level of experiencing with his morphological studies of plants and his scientific work (particularly optics).


    Earth, Water, Air, and Fire
    Earth, Water, Air, and Fire